Cases 1 - 10 of 78
HILL v. BUFFALO
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newkirk v. Wade, et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Veronica Newkirk and Veronica D. Newkirk
Defendant:
Christopher Wade, Trooper John Doe 1, Trooper John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHARPE v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00853
Petitioner:
JERRY L. SHARPE
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Buffaloe et al
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Eddie Buffaloe, Jr., Mike Slagle, Dexter Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BUFFALO
as 1:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00786
Petitioner:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRIFFIN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00764
Petitioner:
TOREY GRIFFIN
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES and RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
EDDIE BUFFALOE, SECRETARY EDDIE BUFFALOE, SEC TODD ISHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, EDDIE BUFFALO, Sgt. A. ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03193
Plaintiff:
Marshall L. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Eddie Buffalo, Sgt. A. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
