Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Edward Egan v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6580
Defendant:
ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STEVEN A. MCGRAW, Clerk
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Edward Egan, Sr. v. Neil Horn
as 15-7381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. NEIL ANDERSON HORN, VIRGINIA STATE BAR, Lawyer licensing official and DAVID J. JOHNSON, Executive Director Virginia Independent Defense Commission
Edward Egan, Sr. v. D. Barnhill
as 15-7382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. STAN BARNHILL, Attorney at Law, TIMES-WORLD CORPORATION, Owners/Publishers, THE ROANOKE TIMES, Newspaper Company and others
Edward Egan, Sr. v. Kevin Gick
as 15-7359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN GICK, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney and UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR, Commonwealth Attorney for Roanoke County VA
Edward Egan v. Harold Clarke
as 14-7414
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Dept of Corrections
Edward James Egan v. Honorable Glen Conrad
as 11-6470
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GLEN E. CONRAD, United States District Court
Edward James Egan v. Gene M. Johnson
as 11-6469
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Edward James Egan v. Honorable Glen Conrad
as 11-6471
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GLEN E. CONRAD, United States District Court and SAMUEL G. WILSON, United States District Court
Edward Egan, Sr. v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7302
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
