Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Devencenzi v. Tucker et al
as 3:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Robert Devencenzi
Defendant:
Tucker, Lewis, Eldon K. McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Bloor v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 19-16159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH BLOOR
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, E. K. MCDANIEL, AKA Eldon K. McDaniel, RONALD HANNAH and others
Igbinovia v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv00588
Defendant:
Sr. Brian Williams, Eldon K. McDaniels, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Enoma Igbinovia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Anderson v. Quentin Byrne, et al
as 19-15602
Defendant / Appellee:
TARA CARPENTER, JAMES GREG COX, JETHRO PARKS and others
Defendant:
K. LEGRAND and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON
Perez-Marquez v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Marquez
Defendant:
Pickett M. Hubbard, Eldon K. McDaniels, Kay Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamedula v. Carr et al
as 3:2018cv00544
Defendant:
Nate Wake, Barbara Cegavske, Adam Laxalt and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kamedula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Eldon K McDaniel, Rusti Donnelly, V. Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Anderson v. NDOC, et al
as 18-15263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, QUENTIN BYRNE, VALAREE OLIVAS and others
Rankin v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2017cv02156
Defendant:
L. Adams, Romeo Aranas, A. Buen and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taniko Smith v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 17-15960
Petitioner - Appellant:
TANIKO C. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, BRIAN WARD, Associate Warden and ELDON K. MCDANIEL, Interim Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
