Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ennis v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00434
Plaintiff:
Merle L. Ennis
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Moody et al v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02029
Plaintiff:
Dolphin Moody , Ezekial Aguilar , D'Marcus Barnes and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Jannsen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nesbitt et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00976
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
LaMondre Nesbitt , Linda Gunn , Jeffrey Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ennis v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ennis and Harold Ennis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ennis v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
Doris L Ennis
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Anheuser Busch Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Spencer-Flournoy v. Clark et al
as 4:2008cv00761
Plaintiff:
Lillian Spencer-Flournoy
Defendant:
Jason G Clark, Jason G Clark, Ennis Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ennis v. ITT Corporation et al
as 6:2008cv03339
Plaintiff:
Earl Jackson Ennis
Defendant:
ITT Corporation, ITT Corporation, Pure-Flo Precision Disability Plan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Long v. Minor
as 2:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ennis M. Long
Defendant:
Dean Minor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Long v. Moberly Correctional Center
as 4:2008cv00446
Plaintiff:
Ennis M Long, Sr
Defendant:
Moberly Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
