Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cleary v. Austin Lloyd, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
William Kevin Cleary
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc., Austin Coins, Inc., Eric P Lesak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Grindle v. Austin Coins, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
David R Grindle and David R. Grindle
Cross Defendant:
Austin Coins, Inc.
Defendant:
Eric P. Lesak, Patrick J. White, David Schmidt and others
Other:
P. White Holdings, LLC and Brandon E. Chancey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Eakins v. Austin Lloyd, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Annamarie F Eakins and Annamarie F. Eakins
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc, Austin Coins, Inc., Brandon E Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fikse v. Austin Lloyd, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
John H Fikse and John H. Fikse
Defendant:
Austin Lloyd, Inc., Austin Coins, Inc., Eric P. Lesak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nowell v. Austin Coins, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bobby Nowell
Defendant:
Austin Coins, Inc, Eric P Lesak, Timothy James King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Keith v. Austin Coins, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09461
Plaintiff:
Earl E Keith and Earl E. Keith
Defendant:
Austin Coins, Inc, Christian Foster, Brandon E Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Friedman et al v. Lesak et al
as 4:2019cv00382
Defendant:
Eric P Lesak, Global Research, LLC (NY) and Global Research, LLC (PA)
Plaintiff:
Irving Friedman and Joel Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LESAK et al
as 1:2018cv01951
Defendant:
ERIC P LESAK, GLOBAL RESEARCH, LLC (NY), GLOBAL RESEARCH, LLC (PA) and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
