Cases 1 - 10 of 1,572
Duarte Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-929
Petitioner:
SONIA YULIETH DUARTE RODRIGUEZ, DIEGO STEVEN LOPEZ MORENO, ANDRES ESTEBAN LOPEZ DUARTE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zuniga et al v. Kifa et al
as 7:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Juan Pedro Zuniga, Alma Alicia Zuniga and Esteban Zuniga
Defendant:
Alex Kifa, Igor Komlov and Kupel Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Esteban v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Ethel Esteban
Defendant:
L'ORAL USA, INC., and Softsheen-Carson LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hernandez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Esteban Diego Hernandez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Prada Garcia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2173
Petitioner:
SANDRO PRADA GARCIA, YESICA ALEJANDRA BARRETO NINO, MARLON ESTEBAN PRADA ACOSTA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Bolanos v. Garland
as 24-2085
Petitioner:
RAUL ESTEBAN RAMIREZ-BOLANOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Uribe et al v. Prestige Car Care of NY Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02308
Plaintiff:
Johan Esteban Cardona Uribe
Defendant:
Prestige Car Care of NY Inc. and Eddie Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Roger Real v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1545
Petitioner:
ROGER ESTEBAN REAL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Urban Wolf Management LLC v. Esteban Carreras Cigar Co
as 9:2024cv80305
Plaintiff:
Urban Wolf Management LLC
Defendant:
Esteban Carreras Cigar Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
