Cases 41 - 50 of 55,147
Sextro v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Sextro
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burr et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 9:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Cindy J. Burr and Michael J. Burr
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASE ENTERED IN ERROR: DUPLICATE CASE OF 22-cv-1825 JNE/DTS Giles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Timothy Giles and Lydia Wilson
Defendant:
3M Company, Ethicon Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
Sheila Rivera
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rowena Crowe, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 23-11128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROWENA K. CROWE and ROBERT H. CROWE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Brown v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Tracey Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and M.D. Joel T Metze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poyle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
Brian Poyle
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benik v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Maria Benik
Defendant:
Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Banks v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Banks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Rigo Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
