Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gray v. Revlon, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv13053
Plaintiff:
Earl Gray
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gray v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Marcus Earl Gray
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Tulalip Tribal Court
as 2:2019cv01623
Petitioner:
James Earl Gray, Jr
Respondent:
Tulalip Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray v. Snohomish County Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00900
Plaintiff:
James Earl Gray, Jr
Defendant:
Snohomish County Corrections, Sweeney and Machyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2014cv01047
Petitioner:
David Earl Gray
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gutierrez et al
as 2:2014at00150
Plaintiff:
Ramses Gutierrez , Jonathan Jacob , Toussaint Chivars and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gutierrez, et al. v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, et al.
as 2:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ramses Gutierrez , Jonathan Jacob , Toussaint Chivars and others
Defendant:
Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, AT&T Digital Life, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRANT et. al. v. EARL GRAY & SONS, INC.
as 1:2013cv01077
Defendant:
EARL GRAY AND SONS INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GRANT and JOHN R. JACK-LAMEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hudges v. Donoho et al
as 4:2012cv03289
Plaintiff:
Edward S Hodges
Defendant:
Mike Donoho, Peter Scheeb, William Bouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
David Gray v. Gary Swarthout
as 11-17888
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID EARL GRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
