Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Morris v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Bobby Earl Morris
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America, Safeco National Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
William Morris v. United States
as 21-1753
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Earl Morris
Morris v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2020cv01447
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Earl Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Morris v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00121
Plaintiff:
Roger Earl Morris
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Morris v. Grady
as 6:2015cv01472
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Morris
Respondent:
Christopher Grady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. William Morri
as 14-3336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William Earl Morris
Dorothy M. Andres et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02316
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M. Andres , Deeya Quentina Adam , Joyce Apodaca and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dorothy M. Andres et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-01820
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M. Andres , Deeya Quentina Adam , Joyce Apodaca and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
Dorothy M. Andres et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01820
Plaintiff:
Deeya Quentina Adam, Dorothy M. Andres, Joyce Apodaca and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
James Morris v. Walmart Stores East, LP, et al
as 13-10044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WALMART STORES EAST, LP, WILLARD ANTHONY WOODS and BUDDY WAYNE JOHNSON, as Agents, Servants of Walmart Store East, LP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
