Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Brittney Sanders et al v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Brittney Sanders, Janelle Popken, Bonny Nasimi and others
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc., Hyundai Motor America, Does 1 through 100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
v. Smith et al
as 2:2021at01077
Defendant:
Gilbert Earl Smith, Warden Matthew Atchley and People of the State of California Real Party in Interest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Atchley et al
as 2:2021at01076
Petitioner:
Gilbert Earl Smith
Respondent:
Warden Matthew Atchley and People of the State of California Real Party in Interest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC)Smith v. Atchley et al
as 2:2021cv02080
Petitioner:
Gilbert Earl Smith
Respondent:
Matthew Atchley and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pegeron et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv06822
Plaintiff:
Alisha M. Pegeron, Andre Christian, Aris A. Bess and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vadim Stanley Miesegaes v. Malinda Durnen et al
as 2:2020cv09945
Plaintiff:
Vadim Stanley Miesegaes
Defendant:
Jason Black, Malinda Durnen, Earl Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metz et al v. Sharp Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01552
Defendant:
Sharp Healthcare, Inc., Does 1 through 25, Christopher R. Calvert, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Charles Metz, Jennifer Rose Perry, Jeffrey Metz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 wd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Earl Smith Jr v. Daniel Paramo
as 2:2015cv01391
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo
Petitioner:
Mr Joseph Earl Smith
Wolff et al v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 2:2014at01631
Plaintiff:
Katryna Wolff , Donald William Ruddell , James Henery Amundsen and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
