Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Watts v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00852
Plaintiff:
Karlin Watts
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of California, Eric Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Racklin, et al.
as 2:2017cv00799
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Reed
Defendant:
E. Racklin, D. Easterling, T. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamczyk et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv01846
Plaintiff:
Selene Adamczyk , Troy Adamczyk , Candace Adams and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer HealthCare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Easterling v. Erwin
as 3:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
Jamal Easterling
Defendant:
Erwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
28620 Gordon Hill Rd. Trust Dated 10/2/2015 v. Easterling et al
as 3:2015cv02671
Plaintiff:
28620 Gordon Hill Rd. Trust Dated 10/2/2015
Defendant:
Christopher J. Easterling, Rhonda L. Easterling, Does 1-10 Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairfield Quail Terrace, LLC v. Easterling
as 2:2015cv01813
Plaintiff:
Fairfield Quail Terrace, LLC
Defendant:
Patricia Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brown et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2014cv02651
Plaintiff:
Alice J. Brown , William M. Holloway , Lawrence A. Zimmer and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Bonner et al
as 2:2014cv00757
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Fisher
Defendant:
Edward Bonner and R Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Adamian et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01899
Plaintiff:
Mary Adamian, Soraya Azad, Linda Baraz and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Petitioner:
Marlene Easterling
Candacy Roberts-Anderson et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01904
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Barnes, Toby Barnes, Linda Black and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.