Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Calderon et al v. Dish Network Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv08151
Plaintiff:
Chris Calderon, Nick Patsonikolis and Amresh Boodoo
Defendant:
Dish Network Corp. doing business as Dish Network and Echosphere L.L.C. doing business as Dish Network
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Campbell v. ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.
as 9:2022cv80469
Plaintiff:
Donald Campbell
Defendant:
ECHOSPHERE L.L.C. doing business as DISH NETWORK and ECHOSPHERE L.L.C. a Foreign Limited Liability Company doing business as DISH NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RODRIGUEZ v. Echosphere, L.L.C.
as 3:2018cv00063
Defendant:
Echosphere, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
RODRIGO EDUARDO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Dish Network, et al v. Ray
as 17-1013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DISH NETWORK, LLC and ECHOSPHERE, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW RAY, on behalf of himself and all similarly situated persons
DISH Network L.L.C. et al v. Ray
as 1:2016cv00314
Plaintiff:
DISH Network L.L.C. and Echosphere L.L.C.
Defendant:
Matthew Ray
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Ray v. Dish Network L.L.C. et al
as 1:2015cv01239
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ray
Defendant:
Dish Network L.L.C. and Echosphere L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tajonar v. Echosphere, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2014cv02732
Plaintiff:
Jose Tajonar
Defendant:
Echosphere, L.L.C. , Dish Network Service L.L.C. , DISH Network Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ac Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
