Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hollenbeck v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Tae Hollenbeck
Defendant:
State of Texas
Respondent:
Sheriff Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tamir Abdullah v. State of California et al.
as 5:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Tamir Abdullah
Defendant:
State of California, Michael Ramos, Eddy Lange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Mayorkas et al
as 6:2023cv00771
Defendant:
Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas, The National Security Council and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Woods v. Mischtian et al
as 6:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jon L. Woods, IV
Defendant:
John Mischtian, James E. Nichols, Sandra Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Abdullah v. Lange
as 22-51052
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tamir Abdullah
Respondent / Appellee:
Eddy Lange and Jeff Landry
Abdullah v. Lange et al
as 6:2022cv01096
Petitioner:
Tamir Abdullah
Respondent:
Eddy Lange and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry v. Lange
as 6:2022cv00692
Petitioner:
Demetrius Antwan Henry
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lenderman v. Barina et al
as 6:2022cv00632
Petitioner:
Jason Eric Lenderman
Respondent:
Bobby Dale Barina, Judge Paul Lepak and Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
