Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bibb v. The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
as 2:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Bibb
Defendant:
The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sargus v. Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center
as 2:2022cv14156
Plaintiff:
Edmund Charles Sargus
Defendant:
Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Sargus v. Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center et al
as 2:2021cv14243
Defendant:
Dr. Heather Holmes, Dr. Lill Chamorra, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Charles Sargus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Easterling v. Trump et al
as 3:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Michael J. Newman, Timothy S Black, Thomas M Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Easterling v. Rice et al
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Michael J. Newman, Linda L. Woeber, Matthew Horowitz and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Easterling v. Rice et al
as 2:2019cv00469
Defendant:
Michael J. Newman, Linda L. Woeber, Matthew Horowitz and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Mark Winkle v. Edmund Sargus, Jr., et al
as 14-3340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK R WINKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS, ZACHERY P. KELLER and others
Winkle v. Sargus et al
as 2:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mark R Winkle
Defendant:
Edmund A Sargus, Elizabeth P. Deavers, Zachary Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Henry Adams, et al
as 11-10884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUKWUMA E AZUBUKO
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY LEE ADAMS, Judge, LANCE M. AFRICK, Judge, FAITH S BOCHBERG, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
