Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Cromer #211902 v. Washington et al

as 2:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Erica Huss, Unknown Pelky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromer #211902 v. Eagan et al

as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Defendant:
Michael Eagan, MDOC Parole Board, Brian J. Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson #857142 et al v. Washington et al

as 2:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Demario Johnson #857142, Teywon Beckham #595348, Marcus Howell #872975 and others
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Erica Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromer #211902 v. Huss

as 2:2021cv00205
Petitioner:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Respondent:
Erica Huss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cromer #211902 v. Davids

as 1:2019cv01099
Respondent:
John Davids
Petitioner:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cromer #211902 v. Davids et al

as 1:2019cv00883
Defendant:
Unknown Tinerella, John Davids, Bena Nussel and others
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cromer #211902 v. Davids
as 1:2019cv00848
Respondent:
John Davids
Petitioner:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cromer #211902 v. Stephan et al

as 1:2019cv00150
Defendant:
R. Rewert, Heidie Washington, J. Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cromer #211902 v. Snyder et al

as 1:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Bill Schuette, Amy Bonito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cromer #211902 v. Place et al

as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Defendant:
Shane Place, Ken Tribley, Steve Niemi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.