Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Cox v. Drumwright et al
as 5:2023cv05217
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Corporal Drumwright, Lieutenant Atchley, John Doe Mail Log Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv05196
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv06112
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox et al v. United Services Automobile Association
as 1:2022cv02684
Plaintiff:
Edward Cox and Cindy Fielding-Cox
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021mc01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Cox
as 21-51027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Edward Cox, also known as Jamie Cox, also known as Parker James
Cox v. Lumpkin
as 21-40732
Petitioner / Appellant:
Shane Edward Cox
Respondent / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021mc00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021at00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
