Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jon Milbrand v. DOL, et al
as 17-3451
Petitioner:
JON KRIS MILBRAND
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EDWARD HUGLER, Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Labor and others
Edward Hugler v. GT Drywall, Inc. et al
as 5:2017mc00006
Respondent:
GT Drywall, Inc. and Gary Tetone
Petitioner:
Edward Hugler
Edward Hugler v. GT Drywall, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00782
Respondent:
GT Drywall, Inc. and Gary Tetone
Petitioner:
Edward Hugler
Edward C. Hugler v. Wedbush Securities Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02471
Plaintiff:
Edward Hugler
Defendant:
Edward Wedbush, Gary Wedbush, Wedbush Securities Inc and others
Hugler v. Papantoniadias Pizza, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10500
Plaintiff:
Edward Hugler
Defendant:
Papantoniadias Pizza, Inc., Athenian Enterprises, Inc., Boston Pizza Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hugler v. BAPA Ft. Wright, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Edward Hugler
Defendant:
BAPA Ft. Wright, Inc. , S.H. Subway-Warsaw, Inc , S.H. Subway Florence, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Market Synergy Group v. Department of Labor, et al
as 17-3038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARKET SYNERGY GROUP, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EDWARD HUGLER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and PHYLLIS C. BORZI, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
MITCHELL v. HUGLER
as 1:2017cv00292
Petitioner:
TAMMY MITCHELL
Defendant:
EDWARD HUGLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
F & H Coatings v. Hugler, et al
as 17-9506
Petitioner:
F & H COATINGS, LLC
Respondent:
EDWARD HUGLER, Acting Secretary of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
