Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
King v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff: Edward Lavar King
Defendant: John Q. Hamm, Sheryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward King v. John Hamm, et al
as 22-10343
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDWARD LAVAR KING
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN Q. HAMM, individually and in his full capacity and D. JACKSON, Sgt., individually and in his full capacity
King v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01064
Defendant: D. Jackson and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff: Edward Lavar King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00303
Defendant: Elizabeth Laseter and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff: Edward Lavar King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward King v. Warden, et al
as 17-11391
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD LAVAR KING
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
King v. Scott
as 5:2017cv00234
Plaintiff: Edward Lavar King
Defendant: Latonya Scott
Miscellaneou: staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Ku
as 5:2017cv00225
Plaintiff: Edward Lavar King
Defendant: Lai Man Ku
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Specks
as 5:2017cv00227
Plaintiff: Edward Lavar King
Defendant: Cedric Specks
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Robertson
as 5:2017cv00214
Plaintiff: Edward Lavar King
Defendant: Kenneth E Robertson
Miscellaneou: staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv01349
Petitioner: Edward Lavar King
Respondent: Kenneth Jones and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?