Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Holland v. Weisfelner
as 4:2018cv04461
Defendant:
Edward S Weisfelner
Plaintiff:
John Bruce Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04380
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04375
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06744
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00737
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Weisfelner v. Fund 279
as 1:2012cv08553
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Weisfelner
Defendant:
Fund 279
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Weisfelner v. Reichman et al
as 1:2012cv03273
Defendant:
Stuart Reichman, Ronnie Reichman, Center for Foot & Ankle Surgery LLC U/A Dtd 1/01/1999 (Geroge Joseph Fahoury Jr., Trustee) and others
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Weisfelner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08445
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08251
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Weisfelner v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated et al
as 1:2010cv08827
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Weisfelner
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated , Morgan Stanley/ Retail, Beneficial Holders of Accounts Held in the Name of Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
