Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Aguilar v. Birkholz
as 2:2025cv00121
Petitioner:
Edwin Aguilar
Respondent:
FNU Birkholz and United States of America
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vitale et al v. City of New York
as 1:2025cv01129
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vitale, Getayne Gordon, Michael Lynch and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Aguilar-Roblero et al v. Carrillo-Najarro et al

as 5:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Edwin Aguilar-Roblero, Jose Cruz-Hernandez, Marcos Flores-Reyes and others
Defendant:
Nery Rene Carrillo-Najarro, Asociacion Campesina De Desarrollo De Las Comunidades De Guatemala, LLC, Triple T Family Farms, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Aguilar v. Kuzmin
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Edwin Aguilar
Defendant:
Eros Kuzmin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Orellana v. ACL Cleaning LLC dba ACL Building Services LLC et al

as 1:2019cv02318
Defendant:
EDWIN S. AGUILAR LEMUS, EDWIN AGUILAR, ALEX CASTRO and others
Plaintiff:
Tomasa Orellana
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Aguilar-Ibarra v. Johns
as 5:2018cv00053
Petitioner:
Edwin Aguilar-Ibarra
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Edwin Aguilar-Ibarra
as 17-10791
Petitioner:
In re: EDWIN AGUILAR-IBARRA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Belircom, Inc v. Robert F. McKinstry II et al

as 5:2017cv00036
Defendant:
Edwin Aguilar, Does and Robert F. McKinstry II
Plaintiff:
Belircom, Inc
Ibarra et al v. GEO Group, Inc. et al

as 5:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Edwin Aguilar Ibarra, Odelin Montas, Rene Cadenas and others
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., George Zoley, D. Ray James Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Edwin Aguilar-Ibarra
as 16-13234
Petitioner:
In re: EDWIN AGUILAR-IBARRA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.