Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00917
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Francis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv04554
Plaintiff:
Hopeton Francis
Defendant:
Eulik Sampson, Edwin Gould, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dyer v. Edwin Gould Forster Care Agency et al
as 1:2019cv00531
Defendant:
Ms. Andrea and Edwin Gould Forster Care Agency
Plaintiff:
Evelynn Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Francis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv05376
Plaintiff:
Hopeton Francis
Defendant:
City of New York, Edwin Gould, Detective John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. City, State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv05969
Defendant:
City, State of New York, John Doe, Eulik Sampson and others
Plaintiff:
Hopeton Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families
as 1:2017cv07137
Defendant:
Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families
Plaintiff:
James Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Brazley v. ACS et al
as 1:2016cv07138
Defendant:
ACS, Aimee Ambush, Nova Jacob Benner and others
Plaintiff:
Yajaida Brazley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dyer v. Family Court et al
as 1:2016cv06876
Defendant:
ACS, Aimee Ambush, Piyali Basak and others
Plaintiff:
Ivree Dyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. City of New York
as 16-4001
Plaintiff:
Faris Abdul-Matiyn
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephanie Ann Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Chu Chong, Edwin Gould Services for Children & Families, inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
