Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Natalie Woods Bey, et al v. Ally Bank, et al
as 22-5273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATALIE ELAINE WOODS BEY and CLIFTON BOYD WOODS BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLY BANK, JEFFREY BROWNLEE, JENNIFER LACLAIR and others
Woods Bey et al v. Ally Bank, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01079
Defendant:
Jeffrey Brownlee, David P. Shevsky, Ally Bank, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Elaine Woods Bey and Clifton Boyd Woods Bey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
WOOD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv09533
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
JOANNE ELAINE WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON, et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al
as 3:2017cv07924
Plaintiff:
KAREN THOMPSON , JAMIE ALLEN , SHAY AMBURN and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Plaintiff_consolidated:
JoAnn LaVerde Crucio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MOE/4:17-cv-01654
Plaintiff:
Karen Thompson , Jamie Allen , Shay Amburn and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Thompson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01654
Plaintiff:
Karen Thompson , Jamie Allen , Shay Amburn and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Greenpoint Mortgage, et al
as 4:2015cv00712
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wood
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , ReconTrust Company, N.A. , Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Wood v. Bank of America
as 4:2014cv00073
Defendant:
Bank of America , HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., as Trustee , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wood
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
