Cases 1 - 10 of 1,242
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01262
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Eldridge Washington
as 24-4148
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ELDRIDGE VANBUREN WASHINGTON
Joe v. Marlboro County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Eldred Maliek Joe
Defendant:
Marlboro County Sheriff's Office and Morgan Eldridge Ridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Helburn et al v. Centurion Health Services of Idaho LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nicholas Helburn
Defendant:
Centurion Health Services of Idaho LLC, Solomon Brothers Inc., Saint Alphonsus Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
David Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durwin Bonds, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6151
Plaintiff:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director VA Dept. of Corrections, RICK WHITE, Warden of Red Onion State Prison, K. ALMARADE, Food Service ROSP and others
Eldridge et al v. Home Forward et al
as 3:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Eldridge and Catherine Betty Jean Hoagland
Defendant:
Home Forward, Irvine Matthews, Robert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eldridge et al v. Home Forward et al
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Rachel Marie Eldridge and Catherine Betty Jean Hoagland
Defendant:
Home Forward, Ivory Matthews, Cristina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eldridge v. USA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Patricia Eldridge
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
