Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Santana-Baez v. Emmanuelli
as 3:2025cv01236
Petitioner:
Eliezer Santana-Baez
Respondent:
Domingo Emmanuelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01228
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana-Baez v. Villalobos et al
as 3:2025cv01030
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Santana-Baez
Defendant:
Raul Villalobos, Ana Escobar-Pabon, Domingo Emanuelli-Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landwer v. Santana et al
as 1:2023cv03903
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Landwer
Defendant:
Eliezer Santana, Arbruster Habel and John Doe I
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Santana-Baez v. Vazquez-Garced et al
as 3:2018cv01085
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Santana-Baez
Defendant:
Wanda Vazquez-Garced and Erick Rolon-Suarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santana-Baez v. Negron Fernandez, et al
as 16-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIEZER SANTANA-BAEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE R. NEGRON FERNANDEZ and JESUS GONZALEZ-CRUZ
Santana-Baez v. Compania Manufactura de Zoloft et al
as 3:2013cv01565
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Santana-Baez
Defendant:
Compania Manufactura de Zoloft, Jose Negron-Fernandez, Luis Sanchez-Betances and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana-Baez v. Negron-Fernandez et al
as 3:2013cv01424
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Santana-Baez
Defendant:
Jose Negron-Fernandez and Luis Sanchez-Betances
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana-Baez v. Administracion de Correccion
as 3:2013cv01400
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Santana-Baez
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Santana v. Cummins et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Santana
Defendant:
John Cummins and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
