Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rose Karam v. University of Arizona, et al
as 22-15332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE ANN KARAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, SOUTHERN ARIZONA VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Davis Monthan Air Force Base and others
Defendant:
DAVID LAMB, AMY KENNEDY, SHANNA O'CONNOR and others
LaForge v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2019cv00103
Defendant:
Doug No Sleep, Elizabeth Hall, Jose Figueroa and others
Plaintiff:
Michael F. LaForge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zelesnik v. NASA et al
as 2:2018cv01225
Defendant:
District 12 ODOT, Cincinnati Vineyard Church, The State Of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karam v. University of Arizona et al
as 4:2018cv00455
Defendant:
Suzanne Toyama-Bodnar, David Lee, Thao Truong and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Karam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tahir v. Bangasser et al
as 2:2017cv00586
Plaintiff:
Omari Tahir
Defendant:
Hugh Bangasser, All Managing Partners of Midtown Center LLC, Margaret Delany and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
R. Phelan v. H. Norville, et al
as 10-11198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. SCOTT PHELAN
Defendant - Appellee:
H. SCOTT NORVILLE, PAMELA EIBECK, ELIZABETH HALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
