Cases 1 - 10 of 267
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. FONSECA et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
FONSECA, CHAD EVANS and JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
TINA COLLINS, JOHN HEFLIN and DAVID GOBBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scruggs v. Bridegroom et al
as 3:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Scruggs
Defendant:
Nicole Bridegroom, Titianna Moody, Jason English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANDERPOOL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. VANDERPOOL, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, MARK PAYNE, JAY HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
BETHANY MARELL
Defendant:
OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUDOLPH et al v. FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS MICHIGAN
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUDOLPH and ELLY RUDOLPH
Defendant:
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS MICHIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
