Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Funk v. Belneftekhim
as 24-632
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL ZELTSER, PAUL HOFFMAN, as Administrator of the Estate of Emmanuel Zeltser and VLADLENA FUNK
Defendant:
BELNEFTEKHIM, AKA Concern Belneftekhim and BELNEFTEKHIM USA, INC.
Funk v. Belneftekhim
as 24-633
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL ZELTSER, VLADLENA FUNK and PAUL HOFFMAN, as Administrator of the Estate of Emmanuel Zeltser
Defendant:
BELNEFTEKHIM, AKA Concern Belneftekhim and BELNEFTEKHIM USA, INC.
Funk v. Belneftekhim
as 24-262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMANUEL ZELTSER
Plaintiff:
VLADLENA FUNK and PAUL HOFFMAN, as Administrator of the Estate of Emmanuel Zeltser
Defendant / Appellee:
BELNEFTEKHIM, AKA Concern Belneftekhim and BELNEFTEKHIM USA, INC.
Funk v. Belneftekhim
as 17-4025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Vladlena Funk and Emanuel Zeltser
Defendant - Appellant:
Belneftekhim, AKA Concern Belneftekhim and Belneftekhim USA, Inc.
Funk v. Belneftekhim
as 15-3372
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Vladlena Funk and Emanuel Zeltser
Defendant - Appellant:
Belneftekhim, AKA Concern Belneftekhim and Belneftekhim USA, Inc.
Funk et al v. Belneftekhim
as 1:2014cv00376
Defendant:
Belneftekhim
Plaintiff:
Vladlena Funk and Emanuel Zeltser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Mutual Benefits Offshore Fund v. Zeltser
as 11-3399
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mutual Benefits Offshore Fund
Defendant:
Emanuel Zeltser, Sternik & Zeltser, M.E. Zeltser P.C. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Mark Zeltser and Joseph Kay
Mutual Benefits Offshore Fund v. Zeltser et al
as 1:2011cv02769
Plaintiff:
Mutual Benefits Offshore Fund
Defendant:
Emanuel Zeltser, Mark Zeltser , Sternik & Zeltser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gudavadze et al v. Joseph Kay et al
as 1:2008cv03363
Plaintiff:
Inna Gudavadze, Inna Gudavadze, Liana Zhmotova and others
Defendant:
Joseph Kay, Joseph Kay and Emanuel Zeltser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
