Cases 21 - 30 of 7,637
Emerson v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq00493
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Herbert Emerson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. MIDDLETON et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
EMERSON, AUSTIN, HARTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorbello v. Agco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Sorbello
Defendant:
Agco Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Falkner v. Emerson
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Bertha Marie Falkner
Defendant:
Irving Emerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner:
Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent:
William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REEVES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
RICHARD REEVES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMERSON, NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hang et al v. Halloin et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mailee Hang, Tou Vang Hang, Mailee Hang Estate and Trust and others
Defendant:
Scott R Halloin, Sheila L Shadman Emerson, Molly S Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Emerson v. VA Ann Arbor Health Care System et al.
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Joseph Emerson
Defendant:
VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Toledo VA Clinic, St. Charles Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
