Cases 1 - 10 of 77
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant:
CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
DARRELL DURHAM
Respondent:
EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURRITT v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BURRITT
Defendant:
EMERSON, AMY ROLLINGS and DAWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. MIDDLETON et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
EMERSON, AUSTIN, HARTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEVES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
RICHARD REEVES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMERSON, NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. STIEN et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
NARVEL WHITFIELD
Defendant:
STIEN, HARTZEL, ABNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
KEAGAN ISSAC JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SERVIZZI and CHRIS PLATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv02173
Plaintiff:
VINCENT E. CROSS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, EMERSON, AUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARKINS et al v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02086
Plaintiff:
CHRIS E. HARKINS
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONALD EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
