Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Baldwin v. Johnson
as 1:2011cv00263
Petitioner:
Darnell Baldwin
Respondent:
Robert Johnson, Emmitt L. Sparkman
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2011cv00115
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Barry Beaven, Lorenzo Cabe
and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Porter
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Torns v. Epps et al

as 3:2011cv00563
Plaintiff:
Charles Torns, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Ronald King
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Robert Jones v. Emmitt Sparkman, et al
as 11-60561
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMITT L SPARKMAN, MIKE MOORE
Taylor v. Sparkman et al

as 4:2011cv00098
Defendant:
Juanita Spivey, Irene Coleman, Earnest King
and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Taylor
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Epps et al

as 3:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tito Bailey
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Bertha Spivey
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Hogan v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 11-60270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN HOGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMMITT L SPARKMAN, also known as E. L. Sparkman, Deputy Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, RICKY SCOTT, STG Coordinator
and others
Bolden v. Sparkman et al

as 4:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Bolden
Defendant:
Emmitt L. Sparkman, John Hopkins, Brenda Cox
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenwood v. Epps et al
as 2:2011cv00004
Defendant:
STGMU-8, Charles Scarborough, Emmitt L. Sparkman
and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas Greenwood
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Kelly et al

as 2:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Davis
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, Ronald King, Regina Hancock
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.