Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Hicks v. Epps et al
as 4:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Anthony Hicks
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Dale Caskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Sparkman
as 4:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Alex T. Branch
Defendant:
Emmitt L. Sparkman, Faye Noel, Verlena Flagg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00548
Plaintiff:
Antonio Byrd
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Haley Barbour, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McCray v. Epps et al
as 1:2008cv00296
Plaintiff:
Ronnie C. McCray
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Preston Goff, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carney v. Sparkman
as 08-60828
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES CARNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMITT L SPARKMAN, Superintendent
Saunders v. Sparkman
as 08-60176
Petitioner - Appellant:
HERMAN SAUNDERS
Respondent - Appellee:
EMMITT L SPARKMAN
Keyes v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Billy Gene Keyes
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parisie v. Epps, et al
as 07-60228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN STEPHAN PARISIE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, EMMITT L SPARKMAN, Mississippi Department of Corrections Deputy Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, JESSIE STREETER, Warden, Area IV, in his individual and official capacities and others
Bradley v. MS Dept Corrections, et al
as 07-60043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONDRIC BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Classification Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
