Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Romero Calderon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1578
Petitioner:
FRANCIS PAMELA ROMERO CALDERON, AARO ENRIQUE DIAZ ROMERO and VALERY SOFIA DIAZ ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reina de Diaz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1398
Petitioner:
ROXANA GUADALUPE REINA DE DIAZ, DIEGO ENRIQUE DIAZ REYNA and MATEO ALEXANDER DIAZ REINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Diaz v. Garland
as 24-123
Petitioner:
SALVADOR ENRIQUE DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
DIAZ v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE DIAZ
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and ANGELA GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fillman et al v. First Community Insurance Company et al
as 6:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fillman and Ashley Tillman
Defendant:
First Community Insurance Company, Allied American Adjusting Company of Florida, LLC. and Enrique Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diaz v. Osman, et al.
as 23-2085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
M. OSMAN, Doctor, DITOMAS, SRN, AMY MAGARUH, RN and others
(PC) Diaz v. Osman et al
as 2:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz and Miguel Enrique Diaz
Defendant:
M. Osman, DiTomas, Amy Magaruh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enrique Diaz et al v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv05608
Plaintiff:
Enrique Diaz and Marvin Gonzalez
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Does 1-50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Diaz et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv22271
Plaintiff:
Maria Diaz and Enrique Diaz
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. and American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
