Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION et al v. BCH TECHNOLOGIES LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01067
Plaintiff:
EPSON PORTLAND INC., SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION and EPSON AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
BCH TECHNOLOGIES LLC, SHENGTENG HU, ZHUHAI DU FU E-COMMERCE CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Epson America Inc v. Curtis International Ltd
as 3:2018cv03134
Defendant:
Curtis International Ltd
Plaintiff:
Epson America Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Epson America, Inc. v. USA111, Inc.
as 0:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Epson America, Inc.
Defendant:
USA111, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Allen Video Technology, Inc. v. Epson America, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02079
Plaintiff:
Allen Video Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Epson America, Inc. and Seiko Epson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
HOLTKAMP v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00167
Plaintiff:
LYNNE M. HOLTKAMP
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Stern v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Shawn Stern, Shawn Stern, Shawn Stern and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Flanagan v. AU Optronics Corp., et al
as 3:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Donna Jeanne Flanagan
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp, America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Martich v. AU Optronics Corp. America et al
as 5:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Martich and John Martich
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., LTD., CHI MEI Optoelectronics USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
