Cases 1 - 10 of 59
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2000cv01898
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, American Distilling & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Melanie J. Arcure and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Coastal Oil New England, Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Kewanee Industries Inc., Chevron Puerto Rico LLC and others
Defendant:
Citgo Refining and Chemical Company, L.P., Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company L.P., Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company and others
Cross Claimant:
El Paso Corporation, Lyondell Chemical Company, Ultramar Energy, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Flint Hills Resources, LP, Claudia Christiansen and Hamner institutes for health science, the
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Northville Industries Corp.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Town of Kouts, United Water New York, Inc. and Village of Bethalto
Consolidated Defendant:
Valero Refining Company Texas, L.P., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Oil Coroporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A&A McHenry, Inc., Chestnut Mart of Newburgh, Inc., Chestnut Petroleum Dist., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, American Refining Group Inc.'s, Buckley Energy Group, Ltd. and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Ibrahim Aykanat, George Chapklin, Jr., Stephen Chapklin and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges, Kenneth E. Warner, Kieran Gostin and others
Appellant:
The State of New Hampshire
Intervenor:
United States
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Huber v. Equistar Chemicals LP
as 2:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Michael Huber
Defendant:
Equistar Chemicals LP, Equistar Chemicals L P, Lyondellbasell Inc and others
King v. Lyondellbasell Inc
as 2:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Dusty King
Defendant:
Equistar Chemicals LP, Equistar Chemicals L P, Lyondellbasell Inc and others
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Ortego v. Lyondellbasell Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
Brad Ortego
Defendant:
Equistar Chemicals LP, Lyondellbasell Inc, Tony Wood and others
Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC D/B/A 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou,LLC doing business as 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., Aetna Better Health of Texas Inc, Aetna Health And Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Performance Contractors, Inc. v. Equistar Chemicals, LP
as 4:2020cv01237
Defendant:
Equistar Chemicals, LP
Plaintiff:
Performance Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00355
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00524
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
LYONDELLBASELL ACETYLS, LLC, LYONDELL CHEMICAL COMPANY and EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP
Interested Party:
LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
