Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Gill et al v. Warden, FCC Coleman et al
as 5:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill and Eric Bryant
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman, United States of America and Prison Correctional Officers, FCC Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
TYNER v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
CARLTON B TYNER
Defendant:
SGT PAUL THOMAS, C/O GIBSON, C/O GOLPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRANFORD v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
BILLY CRANFORD, III
Defendant:
ERIC BRYANT, DONALD K WILLIAMS and KYLE SELPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Gomez et al
as 2:2022cv12169
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Bryant
Defendant:
Miguel Gomez, Ebony Rasco, Bobby Jo Villanueva and others
ROBINSON v. WINHEIM et al
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
TITUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
DAVID TITUS WINHEIM, LEWIS LAMB, ERIC BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Shaun J. Hoover
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Eric Bryant, Tracy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARRIOR v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
TYKELL FARRIOR
Defendant:
SGT CHRIS THOMPSON, SGT HOLLIS, LT LAKENDRA WAKEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANNON v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
CORDERO CANNON
Defendant:
SHERIFF ERIC BRYANT and DA LEWIS LAMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. RAINES et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
DAMARRIOUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MELVIN RAINES, LEWIS LAMB, ERIC BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03569
Plaintiff:
ERIC BRYANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
