Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Eric Burgie v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2866
Petitioner:
Eric C. Burgie
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Eric Burgie v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2754
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric C. Burgie
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Eric Burgie v. Randy Watson, et al
as 22-2235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric C. Burgie
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Former Director of ADC (originally named as Wendy Kelly), Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Jada Lawson, Executive Assistant Director, ADC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, ADC (originally named as Watson), Mark Cashion, Warden (originally named as Cashion), Maurice Williams, Major, ADC (originally named as M Williams) and others
Burgie v. Pike et al
as 6:2021cv06013
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Burgie
Defendant:
John Homer Wright and Jeannie Pike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgie v. Chapmond et al
as 6:2021cv06007
Defendant:
Paul Bosson, Paul R Norris, Darrel Blount and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C Burgie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgie v. Chapmond et al
as 4:2020cv01520
Defendant:
Paul Bosson, Paul R Norris, Darrel Blount and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C Burgie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgie et al v. Kelly et al
as 5:2019cv00352
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jiles-Wittaker, Chisle and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C Burgie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgie v. Kelley et al
as 2:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Eric C Burgie
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Marshall Reed, Dycus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgie v. Kelly
as 5:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Eric C Burgie
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eric Burgie v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric C. Burgie
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.