Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Matthew Miller v. Dan Wilcot, et al
as 23-3623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
Dan Wilcot, William K. Busch, Lynn Miller and others
Andrew Delaney v. Upsolve, Inc., et al
as 23-12422
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN DELANEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UPSOLVE, INC., ROHAN PAVULURI, PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Miller v. Wilcot et al
as 4:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Dan Wilcot, William K. Busch, Lynn A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Delaney v. Upsolve, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, Andrew Delaney and others
Defendant:
Upsolve, Inc., Rohan Pavuluri, President and Fellows of Harvard College and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Priest v. Priest et al
as 3:2022cv01313
Plaintiff:
Margaret S. Priest
Defendant:
Eric Emerson Priest and Marie Bariani Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emerson v. Salyer et al
as 4:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Defendant:
Unknown Salyer, Natalya Weigel and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerson v. Haymaker et al
as 6:2020cv01675
Defendant:
Richard J. Walsh, Gideon T. Haymaker, Brian P. Golson and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Emerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Emerson v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Lucy Burciaga, Tracy Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Lucy Burciaga, B. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
