Cases 41 - 50 of 193
HOPKINS v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv01670
Petitioner:
JAMES THOMAS HOPKINS
Respondent:
MR. ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NERO v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00183
Petitioner:
JOSEPH NERO
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SOMERSET COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Younkin , III v. Eric Tice, et al
as 21-2847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL C. YOUNKIN, III
Defendant:
SUPERINTENANT ERIC TICE, MEDICAL DIRECTOR BRIAN HYDE, LICENSED PHYSICIAN B. SMUCKER and others
GIBBONS v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2021cv01210
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BARRY GIBBONS
Defendant:
BICKELL, RICH KUSTENBAUDER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BOYD v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00158
Petitioner:
JOSHUA BOYD
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WEYANT v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00145
Petitioner:
ROBERT WEYANT
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCINTOSH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv03375
Petitioner:
KEENAN MCINTOSH
Respondent:
JOHN E WETZEL, ERIC TICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. TICE
as 3:2021cv00125
Petitioner:
HUBERT JACKSON
Respondent:
ERIC TICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUILES v. TICE et al
as 1:2021cv01208
Petitioner:
Edwin Dolores Quiles
Respondent:
Eric Tice, The District Attorney Of The County Of Pike and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARRINGTON v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv00853
Petitioner:
ANDRE T CARRINGTON
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL PA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
