Cases 71 - 80 of 250
LINDSEY v. VAUGHAN et al
as 1:2020cv00628
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CAROLYN VAUGHAN and others
Plaintiff:
VINSON PERNELL LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03180
Defendant:
Head Nurse Robert Jones, Erik A. Hooks, Dr. Limdsey E. DeGuehery and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant:
Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOONSAB v. HOOKS
as 1:2020cv00446
Respondent:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. HOOKS
as 1:2020cv00434
Respondent:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020hc02067
Respondent:
Erik A. Hooks and Denise Jackson
Petitioner:
Brandon James Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinton et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2020ct03153
Plaintiff:
Allen J. Buttke, Stanley M. Draughon, Wallace Gaither and others
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Roy Cooper and Michael Hardee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Hunt et al
as 5:2020ct03125
Plaintiff:
Domenico Lockhart
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Captain Walter Ward, J.C. Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2020cv00203
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Defendant:
ERIK A. HOOKS, FNU DIGGS, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Hooks et al
as 3:2020cv00115
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James-El
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, FNU Diggs, North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.