Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Devan et al v. Small et al
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Devan , Erin Gloth , Christine Drexel and others
Defendant:
Andre Small and Sherri Small
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 222
Yvonne Gipson v. Thomas Dore
as 15-2591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YVONNE W. GIPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. DORE, Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-15, MARK S. DEVAN, Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-15, GERARD FRANCIS MILES, Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-15 and others
Gipson v. Dore et al
as 1:2015cv02482
Plaintiff:
Yvonne W. Gipson
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dore , Mark S. Devan , Gerard F. Miles, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nash v. Dore et al
as 1:2015cv01513
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Nash
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dore , Mark S. Devan , Gerard F. Miles, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nash v. Dore, et al
as 1:2014cv03804
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Nash and Judy Nash
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dore, Mark S. Devan, Gerard F. Miles, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Dore et al
as 8:2012cv03394
Plaintiff:
Evelyn V. Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dore, Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Wachovia Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01948
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cardoni v. Eastern Savings Bank et al
as 1:2012cv00255
Petitioner:
Teena Cardoni
Respondent:
Eastern Savings Bank, Baltimore County Sheriff R. Jay Fisher, Thomas P. Dore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
