Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Golbert et al v. Walker et al
as 1:2018cv08176
Defendant:
Jane Gantner, Sari Rowitz, Theresa Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling B., Tyrese B., Issac D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Sheetz v. Julie Hamos, et al
as 14-1732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN SHEETZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE HAMOS, Director of the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, ERWIN MCEWEN, Former Director of the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Famly Services, VILLAGE OF BARRINGTON and others
Sheetz v. Hamos et al
as 1:2012cv08477
Plaintiff:
Brian Sheetz
Defendant:
Julie Hamos, Erwin McEwen, Timothy Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bankston v. Innis et al
as 1:2011cv01316
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L Bankston
Defendant:
Brenda Innis, Inge Innis, Debbie Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatro v. Schoebaum et al
as 3:2011cv03150
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Tatro
Defendant:
Edward J Schoenbaum, Esteban Sanchez and Erwin McEwen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G. et al v. Corona et al
as 1:2011cv01538
Plaintiff:
S. G. , B. G. and Maria V.
Defendant:
Elisa Corona, Sousan Bahavar, Alicia Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
N.R. v. McEwen et al
as 3:2010cv00894
Plaintiff:
N.R.
Defendant:
Erwin McEwen, Regina Parker, Angela Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trombetta v. McEwen et al
as 1:2010cv05193
Plaintiff:
Tamara L. Trombetta
Defendant:
Erwin McEwen and Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baltimore v. McEwen et al
as 1:2010cv01031
Plaintiff:
Victor Baltimore
Defendant:
Erwin McEwen, Roberta Vanorsby, Rebecca Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
