Cases 1 - 10 of 4,311
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jones and Assistant Chief Diane Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Green v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Bettie Green
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fairchild v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Dennis Fairchild
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PACHECO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
YARY PACHECO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bohman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05259
Plaintiff:
Martin Bohman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yero v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04609
Plaintiff:
Vivian Crespo Yero
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lowe v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv03758
Plaintiff:
Sherri-Rachelle Lowe
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc. and Food and Drug Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hallac v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03529
Plaintiff:
Tracey Hallac
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Williams v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03245
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sextro v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Sextro
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
