Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ricky Gray v. James Tilton, et al
as 16-16809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TILTON, ROBERT WONG, MATTHEW CATES and others
Scott Cook v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-16769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT TROY COOK
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Current Director of CDCR, F. JUAQUEZ, Current Warden at PBSP, G. D. LEWIS, Previous Warden at PBSP and others
Gray v. Cogdell, et al.
as 2:2014cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gray
Defendant:
B. Cogdell, F. Gardner, D.L. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00331
Plaintiff:
Scott Troy Cook
Defendant:
Ken Clark, T. Wan, S. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Valdez et al
as 4:2013cv00312
Plaintiff:
Toraino L. Young
Defendant:
M. Valdez, M. Mendon, R. L. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shamburger v. Stewart et al
as 4:2012cv06130
Plaintiff:
Harold B. Shamburger
Defendant:
J. Stewart, M. Ruff, Everett W. Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Myron A. Payne
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James E. Tilton, Tom Felker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Cate et al
as 5:2011cv06581
Plaintiff:
Scott Troy Cook
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, F. Juaquez, G. D. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Dorrough v. M. Ruff, et al
as 11-17875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL REED DORROUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
M. RUFF, Chairperson, Office of Correctional Safety, EVERETT W. FISCHER, Committee Member of the Office of Correctional Safety, T. L. ROSENKRAUS and others
Lonnie Perkins v. R. Crum, et al
as 11-16903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE DONELL PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. CRUM, Correctional Officer, R. CLEMONS, Correctional Officer, J. R. GARZA, Correctional Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
