Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Antonyuk et al v. Hochul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, Judge Doran J. Matthew and others
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian et al v. Nigrelli et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00695
Plaintiff: John Boron, Brett Christian, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and others
Defendant: Kevin P. Bruen, John J. Flynn, Steven A. Nigrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae: Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Antonyuk et al v. Bruen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00734
Plaintiff: Ivan Antonyuk, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Defendant: Kevin P. Bruen
Amicus Curiae: National Police Association, Dr. Jaclyn Schildkraut, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff: Morehouse Enterprises, LLC doing business as Bridge City Ordnance, Eliezer Jimenez, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Gary M. Restaino and others
Petitioner: Prosecutors Against Gun Violence
Amicus Curiae: Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Jonathan Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James
as 22-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant: National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Davidson's, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Letitia James, in her official capacity as New York Attorney General
Amicus Curiae: Montana, National Rifle Association of America, City of New York and others
Petitioner: Ryan Bussee
Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc. v. Defcad, Inc.
as 22-1183
Plaintiff / Appellee: Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc.
Defendant: Odysee User TheGatalog-PrintableMagazines
Intervenor: Twitter, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Defcad, Inc., Odysee User xYeezySZN, Defcad User xYeezySZN and others
Everytown for Gun Safety Actio v. Defcad, Inc.
as 21-3079
Plaintiff / Appellee: Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc.
Defendant: Odysee User TheGatalog-PrintableMagazines
Intervenor: Twitter, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Defcad, Inc., Odysee User xYeezySZN, Defcad User xYeezySZN and others
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. et al v. James We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01348
Plaintiff: National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Davidson's, Inc. and others
Defendant: Letitia James
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, Brady, New Yorkers Against Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In Re: Defcad, Inc.
as 21-2806
Petitioner: Defcad, Inc., Odysee User xYeezySZN, Defcad User xYeezySZN and others
Respondent: Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: Electronic Frontier Foundation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?