Cases 1 - 8 of 8
The Estate of Sharonie Kesselman v. Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing
as 23-280
Plaintiff / Appellee:
The Estate of Sharonie Kesselman, as assignee of by her Proposed Administrator, DANKA SALZMAN
Defendant:
ABC Corporation and ABC Partnership
Defendant / Appellant:
Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC
The Estate of Sharonie Kesselman v. Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07080
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Sharonie Kesselman
Defendant:
Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC, ABC Corporation and ABC Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Oliveri v. Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing
as 22-2377
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lisa Oliveri, as Proposed Executrix of the Estate of Lillian Hamedl, Deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC
Suri v. Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing
as 22-1942
Respondent:
Veena Suri, as Proposed Executrix of the Estate of, Gireesh K. Suri, Deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC
Oliveri v. Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC
as 2:2022cv05197
Plaintiff:
Lisa Oliveri
Defendant:
Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Suri v. Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC
as 2:2022cv04609
Plaintiff:
Veena Suri
Defendant:
Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv01104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
