Cases 1 - 10 of 71
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 23-6402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager, D. C. STALLARD and M. L. COUNTS
Defendant:
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE, J. GIBSON, P. SYLKES and others
Jerry Stanley v. USDC-SAC
as 22-70270
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JERRY F. STANLEY, ARTHUR CALDERON, Warden, STEVEN ORNOSKI and others
Petitioner:
JERRY F. STANLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 22-6785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DYE, R. BISHOP, S. YOUNG and others
Layden v. Stanley et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Timothy Layden
Defendant:
Thomas F Stanley, Logan S Copas, Ronnie T Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2021cv09926
Petitioner:
Gerald F. Stanley
Respondent:
Broomfield and Heather E. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stanley et al v. Denver Mattress Co., LLC (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Sue F. Stanley and Charles S. Stanley
Defendant:
Denver Mattress Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steve Riddick v. Carroll Stanley
as 21-7389
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT CARROLL STANLEY, Mailroom Staff, A. KILGORE, F. STANLEY and others
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 21-6637
Defendant / Appellee:
ART RIP, J. BENTLEY, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Joe Baltas v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6590
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER J. MILGRAM, In His Individual and Official Capacities, SERGEANT LITTLE, In His Individual and Official Capacities, UNIT MANAGER ERIC MILLER, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
