Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Planet Home Lending, LLC v. Maciel et al
as 3:2025cv00161
Plaintiff:
Planet Home Lending, LLC
Defendant:
Eduardo R. Maciel, Eliza F. Ramos and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 (a) Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Planet Home Lending, LLC v. Maciel et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Defendant:
Eduardo R. Maciel, The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and Eliza F. Ramos
Plaintiff:
Planet Home Lending, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Ramos Merino, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1134
Petitioner:
SAUL PABLO RAMOS MERINO, GRACIEL A RAMOS-PUEL, DAPHNE F RAMOS-PUEL and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos v. Platte County Sheriff et al
as 8:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Ramos
Defendant:
Platte County Sheriff, Edward J. Wemhoff, Platte County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
