Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Gonzales, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Pedro F. Gonzales, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
West v. Line et al
as 1:2021cv03076
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Littlebear West
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Line, F. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv01618
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jason F Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas Goolsby v. County of San Diego, et al
as 20-55422
Defendant / Appellee:
OLSEN, Floor Deputy, ZEPEDA, Floor Deputy, MONDRAGON, Floor Deputy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS GOOLSBY
Ramiro Gonzales v. Lorie Davis, Director

as 18-70024
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAMIRO F. GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Goolsby v. San Diego, County of et al

as 3:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Thomas Goolsby
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, William Gore, K. Kamoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2015cv01499
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Armstrong v. Cahlander et al

as 1:2014cv01096
Plaintiff:
Norwood Armstrong
Defendant:
L. Cahlander, F. Gonzales, D. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramiro Gonzales v. William Stephens, Director

as 14-70006
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAMIRO F. GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.