Cases 1 - 10 of 445
Osaben v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
Fabio Osaben
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maluf Domingos et al v. Swacina et al
as 0:2024cv60535
Plaintiff:
Fabio Maluf Domingos and Adriano M. Horiuti
Defendant:
Linda Swacina, Ur M. Jaddou and SECRETARY Alejandro MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
De Souza Neto v. Rolling Stone Granite Fort Myers LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Sebastiao De Souza Neto
Defendant:
Rolling Stone Granite Fort Myers LLC and Fabio Carvalho De Souza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Balby Moreno, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1686
Petitioner:
FABIO BALBY MORENO, VERIDIANA SOUSA DA SILVA BALBY and ENZO BALBY MORENO DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Toro v. Macondo Doral, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv20965
Plaintiff:
Anaida Toro
Defendant:
Macondo Doral, Inc doing business as Macondo Coffee Roasters, Macondo Florida, LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as Macondo Coffee Roasters and Fabio Caro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Vasquez v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Fabio Ochoa Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Florez v. Filistins Power Instalation LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80113
Plaintiff:
Fabio A. Florez
Defendant:
Filistins Power Instalation LLC and Odelin Filistin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Garcia Sarmiento v. Garland
as 23-2079
Petitioner:
FABIO NOE GARCIA SARMIENTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
