Cases 1 - 10 of 411
Lisenby v. FCI Williamsburg
as 5:2025cv03987
Plaintiff:
Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr and Malik Al-Shabazz
Defendant:
FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hillsee v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 5:2025cv03753
Petitioner:
Francis E Hillsee
Respondent:
Warden FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Timothy Hall v. Warden
as 24-7103
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY WESLEY HALL
Josey v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 4:2024cv03779
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Josey
Respondent:
Warden FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gary Boone v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6588
Defendant:
DR. FIGUEROA, Chief Psychologist Williamsburg FCI Individually and in official capacity, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DR. LAXTON, Psychologist Williamsburg FCI individually and in official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
GARY DEAN BOONE, also known as Valerie Boone
Myers v. Thompson et al
as 9:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daniel Myers
Defendant:
Dr. Thompson, Stephen Hoey, Warden of FCI Williamsburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg
as 1:2023cv03920
Petitioner:
Sherman Carnell Gay
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curtis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2023cv03017
Plaintiff:
Jamil Kaarl Curtis and Jamil Kaari Curtis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Williamsburg and C Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Pullins v. Dunbar et al
as 0:2023cv02328
Petitioner:
Demetrius Pullins
Respondent:
R.S. Dunbar and FCI-Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
